Small Bird

Cambridge Liberal Democrat Manifesto 1998

Basic Services vs Prestige Projects

Table of Contents | Next Page

The fundamental difference to emerge in the last few years between the Liberal Democrat and Labour approaches to local government in Cambridge is that while Labour pursues large prestige projects, Liberal Democrats have pushed for better standards in basic services. While Labour has voted almost all the Council’s available capital resources to the expensive Parkside Pool scheme, Liberal Democrats have campaigned for improvements in basic public services, including street-cleaning, pavement repairs, buses, street-lighting, housing improvements and education.

Labour has always argued that prestige projects such as the ill-fated Market Square scheme are necessary to create a feeling of civic pride in Cambridge. Liberal Democrats argue that the Council should concentrate on making the city somewhere to be proud of in the first place. No-one is entitled to be proud of ill-lit, dirty and litter-strewn streets whose pavements are broken.

Our highest priorities for improvement in our first budget will be:

We will also maintain our war against waste and over-budgeting in the Council. Between 1994 when Labour last lost control and 1996 when it regained control, we persuaded the Council to remove £2 million in unnecessary spending or unnecessarily large budgets, and were able to devote the money saved both to improving basic services and to keeping down the Council Tax. Since 1996, Labour has cut services, such as Garden Aid for the elderly and the rent deposit scheme for the homeless, rather than find efficiencies, and it has begun to spend wastefully again, for example squandering £83,000 per year on Council spin doctors.

A majority controlled Liberal Democrat council would order an immediate and thorough review of all council budgets in the confident expectation of finding yet more efficiency savings, the proceeds of which we will plough back into basic services and into keeping the Council Tax down.

Some of Labour’s cuts that pay for their prestige projects:
  • £200,000 on road safety
  • £24,000 on garden aid for the elderly
  • £2,400 on the noise call-out service
  • £100,000 on environmental improvements
  • £6,500 for the homeless
  • £30,000 on the Children’s Arts festival
  • £25,000 on late night and evening buses

Table of Contents | Next Page


Published by Keith Edkins on behalf of R.A.Boyce, 18 Springfield Road, Cambridge. © April 1998
Hosted by Demon Internet Limited, who are not responsible for the contents.