Basic Services vs Prestige Projects
The fundamental difference to emerge in the last few years between the Liberal Democrat and Labour approaches to local government in Cambridge is that while Labour pursues large prestige projects, Liberal Democrats have pushed for better standards in basic services. While Labour has voted almost all the Council’s available capital resources to the expensive Parkside Pool scheme, Liberal Democrats have campaigned for improvements in basic public services, including street-cleaning, pavement repairs, buses, street-lighting, housing improvements and education.
Labour has always argued that prestige projects such as the ill-fated Market Square scheme are necessary to create a feeling of civic pride in Cambridge. Liberal Democrats argue that the Council should concentrate on making the city somewhere to be proud of in the first place. No-one can be proud of ill-lit, dirty and litter-strewn streets whose pavements are broken.
Our highest priorities for improvement in our first budget will be:
- More and better quality pavement repairs
- Higher quality street-cleaning
- Restore Labour cuts in help for the elderly, especially Garden Aid
- Extra help for disabled people, eg dropped kerbs
- Road safety schemes
- Repair bus shelters
- Bring back city wide funding for local environmental improvements
- Expanding the out of hours noise service
Liberal Democrat councillors, through their FOCUS leaflets and regular surveys, know that services such as repairing pavements and keeping the streets clean, although not glamorous activities, are what people expect from local government. We will make sure that these basic services work.
Neighbourhood Rangers
Residents often complain that small local maintenance jobs such as repairing pavements, fences and benches, removing graffiti and tidying up footpaths tend not to be done. We want to see big improvements in this area. We will introduce, experimentally in a few areas at first, neighbourhood rangers, whose job will be to make sure such jobs get done. They will either do the work themselves or contact other council departments directly. Neighbourhood rangers will report to a committee consisting of local ward councillors and residents.
Removing Needless Signs
We have issued a policy paper illustrating the large number of unnecessary, unclear or inappropriate signs in Cambridge. We will institute a review of signs, taking the lead on a matter where the County Council and other bodies also have responsibilities.We aim to remove unnecessary signs and to make sure that signs are only as intrusive as they need to be.
Street Sweeping
Street-sweeping in Cambridge still fails to come up to public expectations. We will make sure that more effort is put into the front-line, for example by having more waste bins at local shopping centres, and we will let the public know exactly when they can expect their street to be swept (or under what conditions it is swept). We will pay for these improvements by making management changes. At the moment there is unnecessary duplication of effort between inspection and supervision. We will combine these roles.
Savings
We will also maintain our war against waste and over-budgeting in the Council. Between 1994 when Labour last lost control and 1996 when it regained control, we persuaded the Council to remove £2 million in unnecessary spending or unnecessarily large budgets, and were able to devote the money saved both to improving basic services and to keeping down the Council Tax. Since 1996, Labour has cut services, such as Garden Aid for the elderly and the rent deposit scheme for the homeless, rather than find efficiencies, and it has begun to spend wastefully again, for example squandering £83,000 per year on Council spin doctors. A majority controlled Liberal Democrat council would order an immediate and thorough review of all council budgets in the confident expectation of finding yet more efficiency savings, the proceeds of which we will plough back into basic services and into keeping the Council Tax down.